BURNLEY last night rejected Sheffield United's second audacious attempt to land star striker Ade Akinbiyi.
As the saga rumbles on into a second week, Bramall Lane bosses are understood to have "tweaked" their initial £1m-plus bid to try to guarantee more of the cash as an up-front payment.
However, with no extra money on the table than the offer rejected out of hand last week, Clarets chairman Barry Kilby has again swiftly rebuffed the Blades approach.
Kilby insisted: "There was a tweak to the offer Sheffield United previously made, which we have discounted as it still not worth contemplating."
As I understand it, United's initial bid was in the region of £1.25million, with a further £250,000 should they earn promotion to the Premiership - something that looks increasingly likely given the massive 12-point-gap they have over third-placed Yorkshire rivals Leeds United.
That combined fee would equal the club record set when Burnley sold England U21 midfielder Richard Chaplow to West Bromwich Albion for £1.5m on transfer deadline day last year.
Twelve months on, the fact that United have returned with a second offer' is further proof that Akinbiyi remains Neil Warnock's number one striking target as he looks to strengthen the squad for a final push towards the Premiership.
Restructuring the new bid is likely to have involved a bigger percentage of the final £250,000m being included in the up-front payment.
However as the main striker at Turf Moor, with 14 goals to his name already this season, Akinbiyi's importance to Burnley remains greater than United's current valuation.
And with the transfer window closing in under a fortnight, it now remains to be seen whether the growing pressure on Warnock to land a striker forces a third, improved offer.
Ironically, Burnley are busy planning for Saturday's Lancashire derby against Preston North End without Akinbiyi, who serves an untimely one-match ban after earning a fifth booking of the season last weekend.
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article