BURNLEY MP Peter Pike cries "Foul!" after his town loses out in a £5million government contest for road safety cash.
The award of the prize to Gloucester, he says, is blatantly political as that's a key town the Tories must win at the election to stay in power.
But whether that claim is true or not, Mr Pike cannot be accused of sour grapes over Burnley's loss.
For this contest required the town to make a case for how this money would help it cut road accidents.
In doing so, it beat off challenges from 26 other towns - and lost out at the final hurdle.
But if Burnley had such an evidently good case, why should it get nothing at all?
That, as much as any sinister vote-buying politicking with the result, is the vexing point about these government-run contests for money - that, ultimately, it is withheld from more places that need it than is given to those which benefit.
Is that not a fiddle, too?
Converted for the new archive on 14 July 2000. Some images and formatting may have been lost in the conversion.
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article