HOW can I justify continuing my collecting of firearms following the recent unspeakably, evil act perpetrated at Dunblane?
Obviously, neither I, nor any other reasonable person can find a reason or excuse for that terrible act. But should I and thousands of other firearms owners be held responsible for the actions of a maniac some 200 miles away?
Licensed firearms owners are generally the most inoffensive, responsible, law-abiding section of the community and, although I appreciate the popular and understandable reaction at this time is to ban the private ownership of firearms, it is hard to accept personal responsibility for the actions of an irrational madman.
However, present public opinion is against the private possession of handguns (and probably any other firearms) and it is probable that, as always, politicians will bow to public pressure.
Name and address supplied.
Converted for the new archive on 14 July 2000. Some images and formatting may have been lost in the conversion.
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article