YOU reported a call for a referendum on the monarchy from Labour MP Paul Flynn who seeks exploitation of the circumstances related to the tragic accident which involved the Princess of Wales, for the furtherance of republicanism.

He will also know that political allegiance can replace substantive issues in referenda - so, while Labour is still popular, "strike while the iron is hot."

The monarchy is being challenged, fostered by a section of the media and underpinned by the cry for devolution, which is a softening up process for joining a federal Europe and perpetual socialism.

Diana's death commanded the nation's sympathy but the circumstances presented no valid reason for castigating the monarchy and the constitution, which the Queen has supported with courage and dedication during her long reign.

Those who sow seeds of discontent should reflect upon the dangers of rejecting a framework that has served the country well. France experienced the dangers in the late 18th century and in our time, so did Germany and the whole of Europe - the significance being that although Hitler secured his Enabling Act within a democratic system, he could have been prohibited by a British kind of constitution; the King could have stopped him.

Most of our people want the monarchy, but the fickle are led to believe, naively, that a diluted version, based upon a "pop star" image, would be more rewarding.

Tradition and the "stiff upper lip" are ridiculed by the intelligentsia and a culture of decadence is eulogized by the "progressives," which is bolstered by the Nanny State.

Fortunately, we have a Queen who towers head and shoulders over the disruptive elements of our society.

Britons would do well by voicing unequivocal support for her firm stand against change - for political or trendy reasons.

COUN J HIRST, Beardwood with Lammack Ward, Blackburn Conservative Association, Duckworth Street, Blackburn.

Converted for the new archive on 14 July 2000. Some images and formatting may have been lost in the conversion.