I COMMENT with some trepidation on 'Letter of the Week' (LET, September 8).
I understand the reasons that prompted your correspondent's letter and had noted that your 'Opinion' column voiced similar thoughts a little prior to this, but I feel bound to point out that the "all of us are eager to point the finger" is rather a sweeping indictment, although I must admit that there are those of us who feel that the 'sensational press' is at fault. No seller, no buyer.
There are many who, like myself, do not, have not, and will not subscribe to this type of press and who deplore the hounding of the Princess by press photographers. I join with them in grieving for lives cut prematurely short, for the manner of their passing and the suffering of those left behind.
For all those of us who do not dabble in sensation, I feel I must reject the suggestion of guilt due to unhealthy reading and I should like to associate myself with the views of the unnamed writer of 'Grief private' (Letters, September 10) and similar comments on the Royal Family in the final paragraphs of Mrs K Livesey's letter that night.
LILLIAN PLEYDELL, Railway Street, Nelson.
Converted for the new archive on 14 July 2000. Some images and formatting may have been lost in the conversion.
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article