I NOTE that local councillors travelled first class to London as a matter of "procedure," even though the council aims to make its staff pay greater personal contributions to their own costs.
As a hospital doctor I am also entitled to be reimbursed for first class travel costs to London. You might call it "procedure." Rather naively however I think that funds for health care should be directed towards patient care, rather than hiring a comfortable chair for me, so I always travel second class. Is it too much to expect councillors to have the same attitude or is the pursuit of narrow, self-interested standard council "procedure"?
Dr C. Granger,
Borrowdale Road,
Lancaster.
They obviously see no problem with this double standard. By the way the return fare was £181 and if it had been booked a week in advance the APEX fare was around £30 and all for a trip which by their own admission has little chance of success anyway - Ed.
Converted for the new archive on 14 July 2000. Some images and formatting may have been lost in the conversion.
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article