I HAVE followed with interest the unfolding debate about the local authority's household recycling scheme. Although my property is not yet included, I am looking forward to joining it and doing my bit for the environment.

As a society, we cannot continue to put increasing amounts of waste material into landfill sites. If we do, then within the next 50 years, we will be filling an area the size of Manchester with out rubbish. Of one thing there can be no doubt is that we must recycle more of our waste while at the same time finding ways of reducing the amount each household produces.

However, I do not agree with the way in which the council has gone about introducing the pilot scheme. Since it started in Prestwich, I have read of the concerns and problems experienced by people. When they have complained through the Guide, the response from our elected representatives has ranged from patronising to insulting.

Finally, at a public meeting, Mr Savage (a council employee) told people who complained that it wouldn't make any difference as the scheme would continue.

The elected members should be reminded that they serve as long as the public vote for them. Perhaps those people who, like me, feel dissatisfied with the way some of our representatives treat us, will put our usual loyalties to one side and look for a candidate who will represent our views. Council officials should be reminded that they are acting on our behalf.

I broadly support the principal of recycling but this scheme needs to be reviewed to meet the needs of householders while also contributing towards the targets the council must meet.

It is essential in a democracy for elected representatives and paid officials to listen and respond appropriately to the legitimate demands of the majority, or be punished at the ballot box.

G. M. VAN HECKE,

Prestwich.