IT was reassuring to read the letter (Camera plea has our backing, June 2) from the executive member for environment and transport, Councillor John Byrne.

He assured us that the council continues to press for a positive outcome for the installation of a safety camera on Bolton Road, Radcliffe. Not only will it make Radcliffe a bit safer, it will also serve as a memorial to the young people who have needlessly lost their lives on this road. They, as much as the living, surely deserve it.

However, if we fail to get the camera, I think the people who have campaigned for one will be entitled to ask why it was that an electronic speed-activated sign was installed on the road for seven days in February.

One week before this, when I attended a meeting to discuss the possibility of a camera - also attended by David Jones, whose 15-year-old daughter Natalie's death ignited the campaign, several councillors and MP Ivan Lewis - we were told by a senior police representative that these devices had been used to great effect in reducing speed and they were planning to use them in the borough.

When it was pointed out that placing one on Bolton Road might harm our case for a camera, it was agreed by everyone that one should not be used until such time as the traffic speed had been monitored, and the necessary criteria had been obtained for the camera application.

Therefore, in using such a device before, or at the same time, as the speed on the road was being monitored, it might be argued that the campaign had been sabotaged. Especially since the figures collected only just failed to meet the criteria.

I look forward to a positive outcome with a degree of trepidation.

ALLAN RAMSAY