An East Lancashire woman who repeatedly ignored warnings to take her dog for urgent veterinary treatment has been banned from keeping animals for five years.
Nine-year-old labrador Robin had extensive fur loss due to a skin condition and a chronic left ear infection which a vet said would have caused him ‘significant suffering’ for at least two months.
Despite being given a voucher by the RSPCA to help with treatment costs, owner Amanda Hawkins failed to take her pet for treatment, saying she had mislaid it.
Although Robin’s skin improved after treatment, the vet said the condition of his ears was considered to be at the end-of-life stage and the decision was taken to put him to sleep on welfare grounds.
At a sentencing hearing at Blackburn Magistrates’ Court last month, Hawkins, 50, who pleaded guilty to causing unnecessary suffering to an animal, was given a five-year disqualification order after previously admitting one animal welfare offence following an investigation and prosecution by the RSPCA.
The court heard that Robin was removed from Hawkins’ house in Keighley Avenue, Colne, on October 4 last year after a veterinary certificate confirmed the dog was suffering or likely to suffer if circumstances did not change.
READ MORE: Stray dog rescued by RSPCA after being found in Burnley
In written evidence to the court, Inspector Vicki Brooks, who attended the property, said: “I was immediately aware of the unpleasant smell that I associate with dogs that have skin issues.
"I advised her that I was there to check that she had taken her dog for veterinary treatment in relation to a number of health issues.
“Robin was in lean body condition and had extensive fur loss and a skin condition affecting most of his body.
"I could see patches where he had scratched or rubbed himself to the point of bleeding.
"His ears were swollen and deformed, and he was shaking his head regularly which was a sign that he most likely had an ear infection.
“Amanda Hawkins told me that she had not taken Robin to the vet because she could not afford it.
"I reminded her that a previous colleague had issued her with an assistance voucher to contribute towards her veterinary costs and she told me she had lost the voucher.”
Hawkins was told Robin required urgent treatment and as she had not followed previous advice, animal welfare officers may have been committed.
READ MORE: RSPCA says it has rehomed 8,000 animals in Lancashire
She agreed for the officer to take him and he was seen at the RSPCA’s Greater Manchester Animal Hospital later that day.
In written evidence, the vet who saw him said: “Robin had signs of chronic ear problems.
"Both the left and right ear canals were markedly thickened, meaning it was not possible to examine them while he was conscious.
“There was a diffuse reddening of the skin over much of the dog’s body with thinning hair, especially over the back. The presence of live flaws was also noted.
“Examination under a general anaesthetic showed that the right ear canal was narrowed so far as being completely closed over.
"The extent of scarring, thickening and signs of infection in both ears are likely to be associated with significant pain and discomfort for this dog.
"Aural haematomas, as suspected in this case, often arise from head shaking as a result of ongoing ear irritation/infection.
“Ear disease with this appearance takes some time to develop. In the early stages, a simple ear infection may not cause significant suffering, but the level of scarring seen here is likely to have caused significant suffering for at least two months, likely significantly longer.”
In interview, Hawkins said Robin had started nibbling himself and that he was treated regularly for fleas and bathed in flea shampoo.
She said she had switched his food to wheat-free but that got too expensive and nothing had worked.
In addition to the five-year ban on keeping animals, she was also given a 12-month community order and told to carry out 200 hours of unpaid work and pay a £114 victim surcharge.
RSPCA Deputy Chief Inspector Susie Micallef, who was also involved in the investigation, said: “This was a particularly sad case to deal with.
"Robin’s suffering could have been avoided had he received early veterinary intervention and his owner acted on the help and support that had been given to her.”
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel