Dozens of wind turbines could be built on a culturally and ecologically valuable moorland estate which is owned by an East Lancashire retail entrepreneur, despite objections from nature organisations and local authorities.
If approved, it would be the biggest onshore wind farm in England with 65 turbines spread across an area the size of 3,300 football pitches.
The next nearest in size is Scout Moor in the South Pennines, which has 26 turbines, and Little Cheyne Court in Kent, which also has 26 turbines.
The largest onshore wind farm in the UK is situated near Glasgow, and contains 215 wind turbines.
Developer, Calderdale Wind Farm Ltd, submitted a scoping report to Calderdale Council in September seeking to build 65 wind turbines in what is known as ‘Bronte Country’, specifically on the Walshaw Moor Estate near Hebden Bridge.
The land, which is used for grouse shooting and livestock grazing, also borders some parts of East Lancashire, in particular Trawden, Colne, and parts of Burnley.
The plans would seek to end grouse shooting on the site.
The moorland estate is owned by Colne’s Boundary Mill entrepreneur Richard Bannister, and his wife Janine, and sits at Heptonstall, close to a farmhouse which is associated with the Bronte sisters.
The Bronte sisters were famous for their poetry and novels, often inspired by the wild moorlands next to their home in Haworth, in-between Colne and Bradford.
The site where the turbines are planned includes a farmhouse and tree believed to have inspired Wuthering Heights, and the moors are popular with fans of the authors and walkers alike.
The scoping report, which carried out consultations with and garnered comments from a number of stakeholders, including Burnley Council, Pendle Council, Bradford Council, Natural England, Yorkshire Wildlife Trust, and the RSPB, was accepted by Calderdale Council in December.
Before any planning approval or development can take place however, a full planning application must be submitted to Calderdale Council, addressing a number of grave concerns and issues raised during the consultation period, which include loss of wildlife habitat and negative impacts on carbon stores beneath the moors.
Documents submitted alongside the scoping report state: “The site is located within the Walshaw Moor Estate, close to the northern boundary of Calderdale with Bradford, and would measure around 2,352 hectares [around 3,000 football fields].
“The site lies within the nationally designated South Pennines Moors Site of Special Scientific Interest (SSSI), and within the internationally designated South Pennine Moors Special Areas of Conservation (SAC) and South Pennine Moors Phase 2 Special Protection Area (SPA).
“The site also lies in a number of other national and local designations including green belt, special landscape areas, and the wildlife habitat networks.
“The lifespan of the proposal would be at least 25 to 30 years after which time the project would be decommissioned.”
Many concerns, including from the Royal Society for the Protection of Birds (RSPB), the Yorkshire Wildlife Trust and the Lancashire Wildlife Trust have been raised.
The RSPB said: “The proposal to develop a wind farm on Walshaw Moor is highly inappropriate, given the sensitivity of this location, with important peatland habitat, significant wildlife interest and protected wildlife sites.
"Based on the information available to us at this time, we have significant concerns about a wind farm in this location.”
A spokesperson for Lancashire Wildlife Trust stated: “I do not believe that there are wholly exceptional reasons for a windfarm to be located on the specified site, as opposed to another area of moorland that does not have the same statutory designations, priority habitats and species, and areas of deep peat (40cm or more).
“Nor do I believe that a suitable compensation strategy can be produced for the construction of a large-scale windfarm on the site that would be acceptable to, and supported by, the Lancashire Wildlife Trust and other non-governmental organisations (NGO’s) who have concerns about the application.
“Whilst the application is to determine whether the scoping for the Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) is suitable, the appropriateness of the site chosen for the development must be considered, and the Lancashire Wildlife Trust would object to a development of this size that would have negative impacts on statutory sites, priority habitats, priority species, and carbon stores.
“The Lancashire Wildlife Trust would also like to backup and support the comments submitted by the RSPB, and the Yorkshire Wildlife Trust, which reflect and share many of its concerns about the proposal.”
Ban the Burn, a voluntary blanket bog protection group based in the Upper Calder Valley also objected, stating: “We are in favour of onshore as well as offshore wind energy, but Walshaw Moor Estate is not an appropriate site for the huge, proposed Wind Farm.
“Walshaw Moor is one of the rare areas of upland blanket bog in the UK and should be protected as a vital carbon sink on a par with tropical rainforest.
“But the habitat survey for the scoping report shows that most of the proposed turbines would be built on blanket bog or degraded blanket bog.”
While Bradford Council said it would need to see documents related to habitat mitigation and compensation for the loss of irreplaceable blanket bog habitat within the site, and also raised concerns that the overall impacts on the visual landscape might be, “more significant than what is being indicated and we seek to ensure this is robustly addressed”.
The director of Calderdale Wind Farm Ltd is Dr Ghazi Mohammed Ahmed Osman, a Sudanese national who currently resides in Saudi Arabia, and has a correspondence address listed on Companies House as the Port of Blyth, South Harbour, Blyth, Northumberland.
Calderdale Wind Farm Ltd will now need to submit full plans to the council before a final decision can be made.
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel