AS protests on 5G masts become more and more common as they are installed, many people have expressed their confusion as to why the debate even exists.

Recently, people in Altham took to the streets in a protest against 5G masts in their community.

They said they are unsightly and unnecessary as no permission was asked from those living in the area.

While others have claimed the 5G masts are damaging to public health, the Lancashire Telegraph asked readers what they think.

Paula Blackburn called them an “eyesore” while Neil Morgan sarcastically said: “Not only do they look beautiful, they will also be very good for your health.

“Remember, your government loves you and would never lie to you.”

Wendy Cooper said: “We have one right outside our home. They’re ugly. So, after getting rid of telegraph poles years ago we now have these! They are of no benefit to me.”

But many think the conspiracy theories to be unfounded.

Jeff New said: “Don't really notice them to be honest. I'm not part of the foil hat brigade either so overall not fussed.”

Stanley Dupand said: “I would like to see some/any safety data published to allay any fears.

“Everybody is aware about the dangers of living under pylons, yet people don’t seem to bat an eyelid about millimetre wave frequencies and microwave radiation as long as they don’t have any streaming or download issues.”

According to the World Health Organisation, the 5G masts do not pose any health risks.

Public ombudsman Which? Published a report on their website in which they state the wavelength 5G operates at is non-ionising radiation, meaning it doesn’t produce enough energy to damage the cells in the body, which can cause cancer.

Dave Hollings said: “Back in 2004, there was a rollout of 3G masts. Same arguments, same fearmongering, same ignorance of the science of the electromagnetic spectrum.

“Mobile phone signals are non-ionising radiation and sit in the same pert of the electromagnetic spectrum as your microwave, TV and WiFi. And they are in your house, not in a nearby field.”

Accrington’s Resident Anti-5G Committee said some masts have been built right outside people’s homes while other residents in Burnley leads going through their gardens without their consultation.

The group formed to oppose the 5G masts and vice-chair Stacey Luckhurst said: “These unscrupulous companies are installing huge masts to provide 5G internet at a much lower cost to themselves but generating maximum profits, regardless of the financial loss, distress and potential health hazard for local residents.”